其实写也不难，但是为了保证质量还是等我搞定眼前的这点事情再说。
这点东西是objective of research，这段没什么实际内容给人看看也无关痛痒。
the objective of this project is to develop an efficient， robust， adaptive， self-learning system by integrating neural mechanisms that govern dynamics at multiple spatial-temporal scales as learned from theoretical neuroscience
顺便摘抄几句 more is different里面的段落，也是本书的指导思想：
a third insight is that the state of a really big system does not at all have to have the symmetry of the laws which govern it in fact， it usually has less symmetry the outstanding example of this is the crystal: built from a substrate of atoms and space according to laws which express the perfect homogeneity of spaces the crystal suddenly and un- predictably displays an entirely new and very beautiful symmetry the general rule， however， even in the case of the crystal， is that the large system is less symmetrical than the underlying structure would suggest: symmetrical as it is， a crystal is less symmetrical than perfect homogeneity
（对称性破缺第四卷会非常详细地讨论）
。。。
for another example， biology has certainly taken on a whole new aspect from the reduction of geics to biochemistry and biophysics， which will have untold consequences so it is not true， as a recent article would have it (7)， that we each should “cultivate our own valley， and not attempt to build roads over the mountain ranges between the sciences“
（不同层次的学科应该应用不同的研究方法）
。。。
the arrogance of the particle physik cist and his intensive research may be behind us (the discoverer of the positron said “the rest is chemistry“)， but we have yet to recover from that of some molecular biologists
（粒子物理学家觉得只有粒子物理是物理）
。。。
marx said that quantitative differences bee qualitative ones， but a dialogue in paris in the 1920s sums it up even more clearly:
fitzgerald: the rich are different from us
hemingway: yes， they have more money
（辩证唯物主义）
还是建议去读原文献，名字就是more is different。
老是有人问我为什么不翻译，首先因为这句话不太好翻译，其次这么着名的思想看看原文才能理解。